linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 3/5] selftests/sgx: Dump enclave memory map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210615130740.3axsxi2m2ozqfofm@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:07:40 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     shuah@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/5] selftests/sgx: Dump enclave memory map

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:45:43AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 6/11/21 10:27 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 04:45:19PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > On 6/10/21 2:30 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > Often, it's useful to check whether /proc/self/maps looks sane when
> > > > dealing with memory mapped objects, especially when they are JIT'ish
> > > > dynamically constructed objects. Therefore, dump "/dev/sgx_enclave"
> > > > matching lines from the memory map in FIXTURE_SETUP().
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >    tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > >    1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
> > > > index 6da19b6bf287..14030f8b85ff 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
> > > > @@ -117,6 +117,8 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(enclave)
> > > >    	Elf64_Sym *sgx_enter_enclave_sym = NULL;
> > > >    	struct vdso_symtab symtab;
> > > >    	struct encl_segment *seg;
> > > > +	char maps_line[256];
> > > > +	FILE *maps_file;
> > > >    	unsigned int i;
> > > >    	void *addr;
> > > > @@ -167,6 +169,18 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(enclave)
> > > >    	memset(&self->run, 0, sizeof(self->run));
> > > >    	self->run.tcs = self->encl.encl_base;
> > > > +	maps_file = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
> > > 
> > > I almost applied these. Does this require root access, if so,
> > > please add logic to skip the test if non-root user runs it.
> > > 
> > > Same comments for all other paths that might require root access.
> > 
> > As Dave stated, it does not. A process can inspect its own state
> > through /proc/self path. E.g. Chrome web browser uses /proc/self/exe
> > to initialize multiple instances of itself for browser tabs...
> > 
> 
> Ah yes. I missed the self part. Thanks for clarifying.
> 
> > As far as other things go, this patch set does not bind to any other
> > new OS resources.
> > 
> 
> Thank you. I will apply these for 5.14-rc1.

Thank you!

> thanks,
> -- Shuah

/Jarkko