[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210615140106.4qqygvptmx4yctwb@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:01:06 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next][V2] net: pcs: xpcs: Fix a less than zero u16
comparison error
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently the check for the u16 variable val being less than zero is
> always false because val is unsigned. Fix this by using the int
> variable for the assignment and less than zero check.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
> Fixes: f7380bba42fd ("net: pcs: xpcs: add support for NXP SJA1110")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> V2: Fix typo in subject and align the following 2 lines after the
> val = ret & ... assignment. Thanks to Vladimir Oltean for spotting
> these.
> ---
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists