lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210616014617.GB969448@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:46:17 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pmbus: dealing with unsigned mantissa in linear reading

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:34:53PM +0000, Chris Packham wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> I've had a report from someone testing the BPA-RS600.
> 
> When they have the input voltage set to >= 256V (apparently the PSU can 
> handle input up to 264V). The Vin reading goes negative.
> 
> CMD 0x88, VAL=0xf3f8, Vin=254
> CMD 0x88, VAL=0xf3fc, Vin=255
> CMD 0x88, VAL=0xf400, Vin=-256
> 
> Looking at pmbus_reg2data_linear() the mantissa is cast to s16 which is 
> correct according to section 7.1 of the PMBUS spec which says that the 
> mantissa is an 11-bit two's complement value.
> 
> It seems that the BPA-RS600 is using a non-standard format for the 
> mantissa (probably because the range of the standard linear encoding 
> can't support values >255V). Does the pmbus infrastructure provide a way 
> for me to define a custom format/conversion for a given sensor?

Essentially you'll have to implement a custom read word function and
convert the value reported by the power supply to a valid linear11
value. In this case, you may have to shift the reported value by 1 bit
and increase the exponent by one.

Not sure what you mean with "standard linear encoding can't support values
>255V". Why not ? That is what the exponent is for, after all. It rather
seems to me that the PS vendor decided to violate the standard to get
another bit of accuracy. 

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ