[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f895afd-3469-c330-a4da-72db89dba6b3@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:17:03 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] powerpc/papr_scm: Properly handle UUID types and
API
On 6/16/21 7:13 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Parse to and export from UUID own type, before dereferencing.
> This also fixes wrong comment (Little Endian UUID is something else)
> and should eliminate the direct strict types assignments.
>
> Fixes: 43001c52b603 ("powerpc/papr_scm: Use ibm,unit-guid as the iset cookie")
> Fixes: 259a948c4ba1 ("powerpc/pseries/scm: Use a specific endian format for storing uuid from the device tree")
Do we need the Fixes: there? It didn't change any functionality right?
The format with which we stored cookie1 remains the same with older and
newer code. The newer one is better?
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>
> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> v2: added missed header (Vaibhav), updated comment (Aneesh),
> rewrite part of the commit message to avoid mentioning the Sparse
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> index e2b69cc3beaf..b43be41e8ff7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
> #include <asm/papr_pdsm.h>
> #include <asm/mce.h>
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
>
> #define BIND_ANY_ADDR (~0ul)
>
> @@ -1101,8 +1102,9 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> u32 drc_index, metadata_size;
> u64 blocks, block_size;
> struct papr_scm_priv *p;
> + u8 uuid_raw[UUID_SIZE];
> const char *uuid_str;
> - u64 uuid[2];
> + uuid_t uuid;
> int rc;
>
> /* check we have all the required DT properties */
> @@ -1145,16 +1147,23 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> p->hcall_flush_required = of_property_read_bool(dn, "ibm,hcall-flush-required");
>
> /* We just need to ensure that set cookies are unique across */
> - uuid_parse(uuid_str, (uuid_t *) uuid);
> + uuid_parse(uuid_str, &uuid);
> +
> /*
> - * cookie1 and cookie2 are not really little endian
> - * we store a little endian representation of the
> - * uuid str so that we can compare this with the label
> - * area cookie irrespective of the endian config with which
> - * the kernel is built.
> + * The cookie1 and cookie2 are not really little endian.
> + * We store a raw buffer representation of the
> + * uuid string so that we can compare this with the label
> + * area cookie irrespective of the endian configuration
> + * with which the kernel is built.
> + *
> + * Historically we stored the cookie in the below format.
> + * for a uuid string 72511b67-0b3b-42fd-8d1d-5be3cae8bcaa
> + * cookie1 was 0xfd423b0b671b5172
> + * cookie2 was 0xaabce8cae35b1d8d
> */
> - p->nd_set.cookie1 = cpu_to_le64(uuid[0]);
> - p->nd_set.cookie2 = cpu_to_le64(uuid[1]);
> + export_uuid(uuid_raw, &uuid);
> + p->nd_set.cookie1 = get_unaligned_le64(&uuid_raw[0]);
> + p->nd_set.cookie2 = get_unaligned_le64(&uuid_raw[8]);
>
> /* might be zero */
> p->metadata_size = metadata_size;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists