linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 11/22] x86/sev: Add helper for validating pages in early enc attribute changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <06ffeaae-259c-67ea-617c-f1d8c1e1c015@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:37:34 -0500
From:   Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
        npmccallum@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 11/22] x86/sev: Add helper for validating
 pages in early enc attribute changes



On 6/16/2021 9:36 AM, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/16/2021 8:10 AM, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>
>> On 6/16/21 8:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 07:49:25AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>>> If you still think ...
>>> I think you should answer my question first:
>>>
>>>> Imagine you're a guest owner and you haven't written the SNP code and
>>>> you don't know how it works.
>>>>
>>>> You start a guest in the public cloud and it fails because the
>>>> hypervisor violates the GHCB protocol and all that guest prints before
>>>> it dies is
>>>>
>>>> "general request termination"
>>>>
>>>> How are you - the guest owner - going to find out what exactly happened?
>>>>
>>>> Call support?
>>> And let me paraphrase it again: if the error condition with which the
>>> guest terminates is not uniquely identifiable but simply a "general
>>> request", how are such conditions going to be debugged?
>>> I thought I said it somewhere in our previous conversation, I would look
>> at the KVM trace log, each vmgexit entry and exit are logged. The log
>> contains full GHCB MSR value, and in it you can see both the request and
>> response code and decode the failure reason.
>>
> 
> I now realized that in this case we may not have the trace's. It's
> a production environment and my development machine :(.

I am mean to say *not* my development machine