linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] io_uring: minor clean up in trace events definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <237f71d5-ee6e-247c-c185-e4e6afbd317c@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:02:17 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Olivier Langlois <olivier@...llion01.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] io_uring: minor clean up in trace events
 definition

On 6/16/21 1:00 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 06:49 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> Indeed, that is what is causing the situation, and I do have them
>> here.
>> Olivier, you definitely want to fix your mail setup. It confuses both
>> MUAs, but it also actively prevents using the regular tooling to pull
>> these patches off lore for example.
>>
> Ok, I will... It seems that only my patch emails are having this issue.
> I am pretty sure that I can find instances of non patch emails going
> making it to the lists...

The problem is that even if they do make it to the list, you can't
use eg b4 to pull them off the list.

-- 
Jens Axboe