[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiTEZN_3ipf51sh-csdusW4uGzAXq9m1JcMHu_c8OJ+pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:00:52 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] alpha/ptrace: Record and handle the absence of switch_stack
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:32 AM Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> Prevent security holes by recording when all of the registers are
> available so generic code changes do not result in security holes
> on alpha.
Please no, not this way. ldl/stc is extremely expensive on some alpha cpus.
I really think thatTIF_ALLREGS_SAVED bit isn't worth it, except
perhaps for debugging.
And even for debugging, I think it would be both easier and cheaper to
just add a magic word to the entry stack instead.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists