[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1623828221-48349-11-git-send-email-huangguangbin2@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:23:36 +0800
From:   Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <xie.he.0141@...il.com>,
        <ms@....tdt.de>, <willemb@...gle.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lipeng321@...wei.com>, <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 10/15] net: cosa: use BIT macro
From: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
This patch uses the BIT macro for setting individual bits,
to fix the following checkpatch.pl issue:
CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro.
Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/net/wan/cosa.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/cosa.c b/drivers/net/wan/cosa.c
index a6629dc..ade6da7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/cosa.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/cosa.c
@@ -122,9 +122,9 @@ struct channel_data {
 };
 
 /* cosa->firmware_status bits */
-#define COSA_FW_RESET		(1<<0)	/* Is the ROM monitor active? */
-#define COSA_FW_DOWNLOAD	(1<<1)	/* Is the microcode downloaded? */
-#define COSA_FW_START		(1<<2)	/* Is the microcode running? */
+#define COSA_FW_RESET		BIT(0)	/* Is the ROM monitor active? */
+#define COSA_FW_DOWNLOAD	BIT(1)	/* Is the microcode downloaded? */
+#define COSA_FW_START		BIT(2)	/* Is the microcode running? */
 
 struct cosa_data {
 	int num;			/* Card number */
-- 
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists