[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1623828221-48349-11-git-send-email-huangguangbin2@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:23:36 +0800
From: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <xie.he.0141@...il.com>,
<ms@....tdt.de>, <willemb@...gle.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<lipeng321@...wei.com>, <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 10/15] net: cosa: use BIT macro
From: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
This patch uses the BIT macro for setting individual bits,
to fix the following checkpatch.pl issue:
CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro.
Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
---
drivers/net/wan/cosa.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/cosa.c b/drivers/net/wan/cosa.c
index a6629dc..ade6da7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/cosa.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/cosa.c
@@ -122,9 +122,9 @@ struct channel_data {
};
/* cosa->firmware_status bits */
-#define COSA_FW_RESET (1<<0) /* Is the ROM monitor active? */
-#define COSA_FW_DOWNLOAD (1<<1) /* Is the microcode downloaded? */
-#define COSA_FW_START (1<<2) /* Is the microcode running? */
+#define COSA_FW_RESET BIT(0) /* Is the ROM monitor active? */
+#define COSA_FW_DOWNLOAD BIT(1) /* Is the microcode downloaded? */
+#define COSA_FW_START BIT(2) /* Is the microcode running? */
struct cosa_data {
int num; /* Card number */
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists