linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 175/244] inet: use bigger hash table for IP ID generation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:32:41 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 175/244] inet: use bigger hash table for IP ID
 generation

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:16:52PM +0300, Amit Klein wrote:
> Here is the patch (minus headers, description, etc. - I believe these
> can be copied as is from the 5.x patch, but not sure about the
> rules...). It can be applied to 4.14.236. If this is OK, I can move on
> to 4.9 and 4.4.

I do not know "the patch" is here.

Please resend it in a format that I can apply it in.  Look at the stable
list archives for lots of examples of backported patches, they need to
have the original changelog description as well as the git commit id of
the patch you are backporting, which I do not see here at all.

thanks,

greg k-h