linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 00/12] add ecspi ERR009165 for i.mx6/7 soc family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YMnPeLHM8SXTEVQP@vkoul-mobl>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:46:24 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
Cc:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
        Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>,
        Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
        Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 00/12] add ecspi ERR009165 for i.mx6/7 soc family

On 15-06-21, 14:10, Robin Gong wrote:
> On 15/06/21 20:08 Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On 15-06-21, 06:36, Robin Gong wrote:
> > > On 15/06/21 14:08 Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > On 15-06-21, 01:55, Robin Gong wrote:
> > > > > On 06/11/21 21:51 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Without this series, SPI DMA does not work on i.MX8MM:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  [   41.315984] spi_master spi1: I/O Error in DMA RX
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I applied your series and SPI DMA works now:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
> > > > > Thanks Fabio.
> > > > > Hello Vinod, Mark,
> > > > > Is my patch set good enough to merge? I remember someone else are
> > > > > requesting it from last year like Fabio.
> > > >
> > > > I have acked the last dmaengine patch, is there any else required from me?
> > > > Which tree will be this merged thru?
> > > Thanks Vinod, mainline is enough I think.
> > 
> > I meant which subsystem tree will this go thru :)
> I thought the patches with 'spi' tag could be merged into spi tree while
> 'dmaengine' merged into dmaengine tree, the rest of dts patch merged
> into i.mx branch. But from HW errata view, maybe merging all into i.mx
> branch is a better way?

Are there any dependecies between patches? If not all can merge thru
respective subsystem. You already have the ack, so I dont mind if you
pick thru imx tree

-- 
~Vinod