linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250-edo: Enable ADSP/CDSP/SLPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:18:51 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250-edo: Enable ADSP/CDSP/SLPI


> Are you okay with the default firmware paths? Or perhaps would it be
> better to shove them into qcom/sm8250/sony/<some-identifier>/* to avoid
> moving them later?

Since we have to either symlink or copy the binaries from the device Linux

is running on to stay clear wrt proprietary blobs licensing, the default

path is fine, as there won't be any other firmware there. If it turns out we

have a better way of managing this, one can always send a patch changing

it.


Konrad