lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:12:43 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] hwmon: (lm90) Use edge-triggered interrupt

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:07:08PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The LM90 driver uses level-based interrupt triggering. The interrupt
> handler prints a warning message about the breached temperature and
> quits. There is no way to stop interrupt from re-triggering since it's
> level-based, thus thousands of warning messages are printed per second
> once interrupt is triggered. Use edge-triggered interrupt in order to
> fix this trouble.
> 
> Fixes: 109b1283fb532 ("hwmon: (lm90) Add support to handle IRQ")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> index ebbfd5f352c0..ce8ebe60fcdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> @@ -1908,7 +1908,7 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  		dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>  		err = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, client->irq,
>  						NULL, lm90_irq_thread,
> -						IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +						IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>  						"lm90", client);

We can't do that. Problem is that many of the devices supported by this driver
behave differently when it comes to interrupts. Specifically, the interrupt
handler is supposed to reset the interrupt condition (ie reading the status
register should reset it). If that is the not the case for a specific chip,
we'll have to update the code to address the problem for that specific chip.
The above code would probably just generate a single interrupt while never
resetting the interrupt condition, which is obviously not what we want to
happen.

Guenter

>  		if (err < 0) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "cannot request IRQ %d\n", client->irq);
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ