linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210617040027.vtqlhxqq7cwzeygg@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:30:27 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:     Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        "Viresh Kumar )" <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "andrew-sh . cheng" <andrew-sh.cheng@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd

On 17-06-21, 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 6/17/21 12:33 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 17-06-21, 10:13, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> >> The devfreq driver(exynos-bus.c) has used the dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
> >> and used the passive governor without the required-opp property.
> > 
> > Which is fine.
> > 
> >> I have a plan to use the required-opp property
> >> between devfreq drivers (exynos-bus.c) with dev_pm_opp_set_rate().
> >>
> >> I'll support them on later if this approach doesn't break the any
> >> rule of required-opp property.
> > 
> > You will be required to make some changes in core for that I am
> > afraid. It won't work automatically.
> 
> Do you think that better to use clk_enable/regulator_enable directly
> instead of dev_pm_opp_set_rate() for using required-opp property?

No. All I am saying is that the OPP core won't work for your use case
today and may need some updates.

-- 
viresh