[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMrS9OUSaCdtGwrE@epycbox.lan>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 21:43:32 -0700
From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
To: "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, "mdf@...nel.org" <mdf@...nel.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com"
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
"nava.manne@...inx.com" <nava.manne@...inx.com>,
"Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
"davidgow@...gle.com" <davidgow@...gle.com>,
"fpacheco@...hat.com" <fpacheco@...hat.com>,
"Gong, Richard" <richard.gong@...el.com>,
"luca@...aceresoli.net" <luca@...aceresoli.net>,
"linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] fpga: dfl: reorganize to subdir layout
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:05:36AM +0000, Wu, Hao wrote:
> > On 6/15/21 1:08 AM, Wu, Hao wrote:
> > >> Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] fpga: dfl: reorganize to subdir layout
> > >>
> > >> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> > >>
> > >> Follow drivers/net/ethernet/ which has control configs
> > >> NET_VENDOR_BLA that map to drivers/net/ethernet/bla
> > >> Since fpgas do not have many vendors, drop the 'VENDOR' and use
> > >> FPGA_BLA.
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > Thanks for this patch. : )
> > >
> > > DFL is not a vendor, but something can be shared/reused. It's possible that
> > > other vendors reuse the same concepts and the drivers of DFL. If vendor
> > > drivers need to be moved inside sub folders, then maybe it's better to
> > > leave DFL in the parent folder?
> >
> > xrt is also not a vendor, more a subdevice framework like dfl.
> >
> > I am not sure what you mean by other dfl vendors can you give an example ?
>
> It's fine, but the description here is a little confusing on vendor/framework
> handling. No other vendor so far, but it's possible, DFL can be used in
> non-intel device, and related drivers can be reused as well. Then a fpga
> mgr driver depends on DFL, should be put inside dfl folder or new
> vendor's subfolder?
>
> Hao
>
I'm somewhat neutral on this. If someone non-intel starts using DFL we could also
move the common parts back ...
That being said, I'm not super convinced we have to move stuff in the
first place.
- Moritz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists