lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1623887812.eoi29y243g.astroid@bobo.none>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:32:07 +1000
From:   Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] lazy tlb: allow lazy tlb mm refcounting to be
 configurable

Excerpts from Nicholas Piggin's message of June 16, 2021 11:02 am:
> Excerpts from Andy Lutomirski's message of June 16, 2021 10:14 am:
>> akpm, please drop this series until it's fixed.  It's a core change to
>> better support arch usecases, but it's unnecessarily fragile, and there
>> is already an arch maintainer pointing out that it's inadequate to
>> robustly support arch usecases.  There is no reason to merge it in its
>> present state.

Just to make sure I'm not doing anything stupid or fragile for other 
archs, I had a closer look at a few. sparc32 is the only one I have a 
SMP capable qemu and initramfs at hand for, took about 5 minutes to 
convert after fixing 2 other sparc32/mm bugs (patches on linux-sparc),
one of them found by the DEBUG_VM code my series added. It seems to work 
fine, with what little stressing my qemu setup can muster.

Simple. Robust. Pretty mechanical conversion follows the documented 
reciple. Re-uses every single line of code I added outside 
arch/powerpc/. Requires no elaborate dances.

alpha and arm64 are both 4-liners by the looks, sparc64 might reqiure a 
bit of actual code but doesn't look too hard.

So I'm satisfied the code added outside arch/powerpc/ is not some 
fragile powerpc specific hack. I don't know if other archs will use 
it, but they easily can use it[*].

And we can make changes to help x86 whenever its needed -- I already 
posted patch 1/n for configuring out lazy tlb and active_mm from core 
code rebased on top of mmotm so the series is not preventing such 
changes.

Hopefully this allays some concerns.

[*] I do think mmgrab_lazy_tlb is a nice change that self-documents the 
    active_mm refcounting, so I will try to get all the arch code 
    converted to use it over the next few releases, even if they never
    switch to use lazy tlb shootdown.

Thanks,
Nick

---
 arch/sparc/Kconfig            | 1 +
 arch/sparc/kernel/leon_smp.c  | 2 +-
 arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c    | 2 +-
 arch/sparc/kernel/sun4d_smp.c | 2 +-
 arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_smp.c | 2 +-
 arch/sparc/kernel/traps_32.c  | 2 +-
 arch/sparc/kernel/traps_64.c  | 2 +-
 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
index 164a5254c91c..db9954af57a2 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ config SPARC32
 	select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
 	select CLZ_TAB
 	select HAVE_UID16
+	select MMU_LAZY_TLB_SHOOTDOWN
 	select OLD_SIGACTION
 
 config SPARC64
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/leon_smp.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/leon_smp.c
index 1eed26d423fb..d00460788048 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/leon_smp.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/leon_smp.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ void leon_cpu_pre_online(void *arg)
 			     : "memory" /* paranoid */);
 
 	/* Attach to the address space of init_task. */
-	mmgrab(&init_mm);
+	mmgrab_lazy_tlb(&init_mm);
 	current->active_mm = &init_mm;
 
 	while (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpuid, &smp_commenced_mask))
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c
index e38d8bf454e8..19aa12991f2b 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void smp_callin(void)
 	current_thread_info()->new_child = 0;
 
 	/* Attach to the address space of init_task. */
-	mmgrab(&init_mm);
+	mmgrab_lazy_tlb(&init_mm);
 	current->active_mm = &init_mm;
 
 	/* inform the notifiers about the new cpu */
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/sun4d_smp.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/sun4d_smp.c
index ff30f03beb7c..a6f392dcfeaf 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/sun4d_smp.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sun4d_smp.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void sun4d_cpu_pre_online(void *arg)
 	show_leds(cpuid);
 
 	/* Attach to the address space of init_task. */
-	mmgrab(&init_mm);
+	mmgrab_lazy_tlb(&init_mm);
 	current->active_mm = &init_mm;
 
 	local_ops->cache_all();
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_smp.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_smp.c
index 228a6527082d..0ee77f066c9e 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_smp.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_smp.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ void sun4m_cpu_pre_online(void *arg)
 			     : "memory" /* paranoid */);
 
 	/* Attach to the address space of init_task. */
-	mmgrab(&init_mm);
+	mmgrab_lazy_tlb(&init_mm);
 	current->active_mm = &init_mm;
 
 	while (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpuid, &smp_commenced_mask))
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_32.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_32.c
index 247a0d9683b2..a3186bb30109 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_32.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_32.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ void trap_init(void)
 		thread_info_offsets_are_bolixed_pete();
 
 	/* Attach to the address space of init_task. */
-	mmgrab(&init_mm);
+	mmgrab_lazy_tlb(&init_mm);
 	current->active_mm = &init_mm;
 
 	/* NOTE: Other cpus have this done as they are started
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_64.c
index a850dccd78ea..b6e46732fa69 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/traps_64.c
@@ -2929,6 +2929,6 @@ void __init trap_init(void)
 	/* Attach to the address space of init_task.  On SMP we
 	 * do this in smp.c:smp_callin for other cpus.
 	 */
-	mmgrab(&init_mm);
+	mmgrab_lazy_tlb(&init_mm);
 	current->active_mm = &init_mm;
 }
-- 
2.23.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ