[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMqZuBssXiMvDxIf@sol.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:39:20 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] block: respect bio_required_sector_alignment()
in blk-crypto-fallback
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 07:58:54PM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> Make blk_crypto_split_bio_if_needed() respect
> bio_required_sector_alignment() when calling bio_split(). Without this,
> blk-crypto-fallback could possibly split a bio in the middle of a data
> unit, and the resulting bios can no longer be encrypted (since encryption
> can only be done on complete crypto data units).
>
> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>
> ---
> block/blk-crypto-fallback.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c b/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c
> index c322176a1e09..85c813ef670b 100644
> --- a/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c
> +++ b/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/random.h>
>
> +#include "blk.h"
> #include "blk-crypto-internal.h"
>
> static unsigned int num_prealloc_bounce_pg = 32;
> @@ -225,6 +226,8 @@ static bool blk_crypto_split_bio_if_needed(struct bio **bio_ptr)
> if (num_sectors < bio_sectors(bio)) {
> struct bio *split_bio;
>
> + num_sectors = round_down(num_sectors,
> + bio_required_sector_alignment(bio));
> split_bio = bio_split(bio, num_sectors, GFP_NOIO,
> &crypto_bio_split);
> if (!split_bio) {
> --
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists