[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <742b2623-e8ff-db1f-9168-bdbde98110dd@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:13:38 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
"Viresh Kumar )" <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"andrew-sh . cheng" <andrew-sh.cheng@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non
genpd
On 6/16/21 6:09 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-06-21, 17:47, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 6/16/21 4:55 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 16-06-21, 13:33, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>>>> Don't limit required_opp_table to genpd only. One possible use case is
>>>> cpufreq based devfreq governor, which can use required-opps property to
>>>> derive devfreq from cpufreq.
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> This is tested with the non genpd case mt8183-cci with passive
>>>> governor[1].
>>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com/
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/opp/of.c | 20 +-------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c
>>>> index aa75a1caf08a3..9573facce53a5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/opp/of.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c
>>>> @@ -201,17 +201,6 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table,
>>>> lazy = true;
>>>> continue;
>>>> }
>>>> -
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now,
>>>> - * as we don't know how much about other cases. Error out if the
>>>> - * required OPP doesn't belong to a genpd.
>>>> - */
>>>> - if (!required_opp_tables[i]->is_genpd) {
>>>> - dev_err(dev, "required-opp doesn't belong to genpd: %pOF\n",
>>>> - required_np);
>>>> - goto free_required_tables;
>>>> - }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* Let's do the linking later on */
>>>> @@ -379,13 +368,6 @@ static void lazy_link_required_opp_table(struct opp_table *new_table)
>>>> struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>>>> int i, ret;
>>>>
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now,
>>>> - * as we don't know much about other cases.
>>>> - */
>>>> - if (!new_table->is_genpd)
>>>> - return;
>>>> -
>>>> mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock);
>>>>
>>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(opp_table, temp, &lazy_opp_tables, lazy) {
>>>> @@ -873,7 +855,7 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table,
>>>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>>>
>>>> ret = _read_opp_key(new_opp, opp_table, np, &rate_not_available);
>>>> - if (ret < 0 && !opp_table->is_genpd) {
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> dev_err(dev, "%s: opp key field not found\n", __func__);
>>>> goto free_opp;
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Plus this and few changes to commit log.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
>>> index e366218d6736..b335c077f215 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
>>> @@ -893,6 +893,16 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev,
>>> if (!required_opp_tables)
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, as we
>>> + * don't know much about other use cases. Error out if the required OPP
>>> + * doesn't belong to a genpd.
>>> + */
>>> + if (unlikely(!required_opp_tables[0]->is_genpd)) {
>>> + dev_err(dev, "required-opps don't belong to a genpd\n");
>>> + return -ENOENT;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>
>> If you add this checking statement, I think that
>> when using dev_pm_opp_set_rate with required-opp property, it will be failed.
>
> Yes, that is exactly what I am trying to do here. Hsin already
> confirmed that you guys won't use this API, isn't ?
>
> The point here is that the _set_required_opps() function only updates
> the performance state of genpds today. So it won't work for you guys
> anyway.
The devfreq driver(exynos-bus.c) has used the dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
and used the passive governor without the required-opp property.
I have a plan to use the required-opp property
between devfreq drivers (exynos-bus.c) with dev_pm_opp_set_rate().
I'll support them on later if this approach doesn't break the any
rule of required-opp property.
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists