linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/uclamp: Fix uclamp_tg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210617085836.lpfeuvzcbsqkgtmi@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:58:36 +0100
From:   Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
To:     Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>
Cc:     "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@...bug.net>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>, Yun Hsiang <hsiang023167@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/uclamp: Fix uclamp_tg_restrict()

Hi Xuewen

On 06/16/21 11:06, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> Hi Qais
> 
> Sorry for the late reply.
> 
> I tested the patch on the "UNISOC T610" platform, and it looks fine.
> 
> According to the two cases:
> case1:
> without patch:
> set task's clamp_min=614(60%), clamp_max=819(80%), the result as:
> [  215.780435]c6  uclamp_test :
> pid=138,req_min=614,req_max=819,eff_min=614,eff_max=819
> 
> after set tg's cpu.uclamp.max = 50%，the result:
> [  420.580443]c6  uclamp_test :
> pid=138,req_min=614,req_max=819,eff_min=614,eff_max=512
> 
> with patch:
> set task's clamp_min=614(60%), clamp_max=819(80%), the result as:
> [  333.533878]c7  uclamp_test :
> pid=138,req_min=614,req_max=819,eff_min=614,eff_max=819
> 
> after set tg's cpu.uclamp.max = 50%，the result:
> [  430.813789]c6  uclamp_test :
> pid=138,req_min=614,req_max=819,eff_min=512,eff_max=512
> 
> case2:
> without patch:
> set task's clamp_min=614(60%), clamp_max=819(80%), the result as:
> [  169.700544]c0  uclamp_test :
> pid=137,req_min=0,req_max=209,eff_min=0,eff_max=209
> 
> after set tg's cpu.uclamp.min = 30%, tg's cpu.uclamp.max = 50%，the result:
> [  246.500634]c7  uclamp_test :
> pid=137,req_min=0,req_max=209,eff_min=307,eff_max=209
> 
> with patch:
> set task's clamp_min=0(0%), clamp_max=209(20%), the result as:
> [  169.700544]c0  uclamp_test :
> pid=137,req_min=0,req_max=209,eff_min=0,eff_max=209
> 
> after set tg's cpu.uclamp.min = 30%, tg's cpu.uclamp.max = 50%，the result:
> [  179.933868]c6  uclamp_test :
> pid=137,req_min=0,req_max=209,eff_min=307,eff_max=307

Thanks a lot for trying it out.

Cheers

--
Qais Yousef