[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c8ca535-398c-0d19-5242-27ed1d3905ec@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:11:05 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] scripts: add spelling_sanitizer.sh script
On 2021/6/16 22:53, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com> writes:
>
>> The file scripts/spelling.txt recorded a large number of spelling
>> "mistake||correction" pairs. These entries are currently maintained in
>> order, but the results are not strict. In addition, when someone wants to
>> add some new pairs, he either sort them manually or write a script, which
>> is clearly a waste of labor. So add this script. For all spelling
>> "mistake||correction" pairs, sort based on "correction", then on "mistake",
>> and remove duplicates. Sorting based on "mistake" first is not chosen
>> because it is uncontrollable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/spelling_sanitizer.sh | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100755 scripts/spelling_sanitizer.sh
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/spelling_sanitizer.sh b/scripts/spelling_sanitizer.sh
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 000000000000..603bb7e0e66b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/scripts/spelling_sanitizer.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
>> +#!/bin/sh -efu
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +
>> +# To get the traditional sort order that uses native byte values
>
> So I am of the naive opinion that everything we drop into scripts/
> should start with a comment saying why it exists and how to use it.
> Otherwise how are people going to benefit from it?
Rigth, I will add the description, thanks.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists