[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82462c00-46da-fbbe-7a8f-d52286cfc7db@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:23:33 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: cohuck@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com,
jgg@...dia.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception
handler function pointer
On 16.06.21 16:16, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> The function pointer to the interception handler for the PQAP instruction
> can get changed during the interception process. Let's add a
> semaphore to struct kvm_s390_crypto to control read/write access to the
> function pointer contained therein.
>
> The semaphore must be locked for write access by the vfio_ap device driver
> when notified that the KVM pointer has been set or cleared. It must be
> locked for read access by the interception framework when the PQAP
> instruction is intercepted.
>
The locking looks so much nicer now. One (optional) thing.
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 +++---
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 +
> arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 8925f3969478..58edaa3f9602 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -803,14 +803,14 @@ struct kvm_s390_cpu_model {
> unsigned short ibc;
> };
>
> -struct kvm_s390_module_hook {
> +struct kvm_s390_crypto_hook {
> int (*hook)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> - struct module *owner;
> };
Can we actually get rid of the structure and use
int (*pqap_hook)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> struct kvm_s390_crypto {
> struct kvm_s390_crypto_cb *crycb;
> - struct kvm_s390_module_hook *pqap_hook;
> + struct rw_semaphore pqap_hook_rwsem;
> + struct kvm_s390_crypto_hook *pqap_hook;
here and below
> __u32 crycbd;
> __u8 aes_kw;
> __u8 dea_kw;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 1296fc10f80c..418d910df569 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -2606,6 +2606,7 @@ static void kvm_s390_crypto_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> kvm->arch.crypto.crycb = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->crycb;
> kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(kvm);
> + init_rwsem(&kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
>
> if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
> return;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
> index 9928f785c677..bbbd84ffe239 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
> @@ -657,15 +657,15 @@ static int handle_pqap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * Verify that the hook callback is registered, lock the owner
> * and call the hook.
> */
> + down_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
> if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook) {
> - if (!try_module_get(vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook->owner))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> ret = vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook->hook(vcpu);
ret = vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook(vcpu);
> - module_put(vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook->owner);
> if (!ret && vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[1] & 0x00ff0000)
> kvm_s390_set_psw_cc(vcpu, 3);
> + up_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
> return ret;
> }
> + up_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
> /*
> * A vfio_driver must register a hook.
> * No hook means no driver to enable the SIE CRYCB and no queues.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index 122c85c22469..d8abe5a11e49 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -353,7 +353,6 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_create(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> init_waitqueue_head(&matrix_mdev->wait_for_kvm);
> mdev_set_drvdata(mdev, matrix_mdev);
> matrix_mdev->pqap_hook.hook = handle_pqap;
> - matrix_mdev->pqap_hook.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> list_add(&matrix_mdev->node, &matrix_dev->mdev_list);
> mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> @@ -1115,15 +1114,20 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
> }
>
> kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
> + matrix_mdev->kvm = kvm;
> matrix_mdev->kvm_busy = true;
> mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> +
> + down_write(&matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
> + kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = &matrix_mdev->pqap_hook;
> + up_write(&matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
> +
> kvm_arch_crypto_set_masks(kvm,
> matrix_mdev->matrix.apm,
> matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm,
> matrix_mdev->matrix.adm);
> +
> mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> - kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = &matrix_mdev->pqap_hook;
> - matrix_mdev->kvm = kvm;
> matrix_mdev->kvm_busy = false;
> wake_up_all(&matrix_mdev->wait_for_kvm);
> }
> @@ -1189,10 +1193,17 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
> if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
> matrix_mdev->kvm_busy = true;
> mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> - kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
> +
> + if (matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd) {
> + down_write(&matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
> + matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
> + up_write(&matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
> +
> + kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
> + }
> +
> mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev->mdev);
> - matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
> kvm_put_kvm(matrix_mdev->kvm);
> matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL;
> matrix_mdev->kvm_busy = false;
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> index f82a6396acae..5d4fe6efbc73 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct ap_matrix_mdev {
> bool kvm_busy;
> wait_queue_head_t wait_for_kvm;
> struct kvm *kvm;
> - struct kvm_s390_module_hook pqap_hook;
and here?
> + struct kvm_s390_crypto_hook pqap_hook;
> struct mdev_device *mdev;
> };
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists