[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMs+hOKafJMu7Sfu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:22:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Add support for frequency
invariance
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 04:49:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Peter: Can you help here on this ? Lemme try to explain a bit here:
>
> We are starting an irq-work (in cppc cpufreq driver) from
> scheduler_tick()->arch_scale_freq_tick(). What will happen if the driver doesn't
> take care of CPU hotplug explicitly and make sure this work isn't queued again
> from the next tick.
>
> Is it important for user to make sure it gets rid of the irq-work during hotplug
> here ?
irq-work is flushed on hotplug, see smpcfd_dying_cpu().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists