[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210617084759.78bc21d1@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 08:47:59 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
John 'Warthog9' Hawley <warthog9@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] bootconfig/tracing/ktest: Add ktest examples of
testing bootconfig
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:59:21 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:41:55 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >
> > bootconfig is a new feature that appends scripts onto the initrd, and the
> > kernel executes the scripts as an extended kernel command line.
> >
> > Need to add tests to test that the happened. To test the bootconfig
> > properly, the initrd needs to be updated and the kernel rebooted. ktest is
> > the perfect solution to perform these tests.
> >
> > Add a example bootconfig.conf in the tools/testing/ktest/examples/include
> > and example bootconfig scripts in tools/testing/ktest/examples/bootconfig
> > and also include verifier scripts that ktest will install on the target
> > and run to make sure that the bootconfig options in the scripts took place
> > after the target rebooted with the new initrd update.
>
> Thank you very much for integrate it to ktest!
> I gave some experimental bconfs without cleanup.
>
No problem. If I was to take bootconfig patches from you, I had to have a
way to test for regressions ;-)
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/ktest/examples/bootconfigs/ftrace.bconf
> > @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
> > +#!/bin/sh
>
> This shebang is for the syntax hilighting. Please remove it.
OK. I didn't even notice that.
>
> > +
> > +ftrace {
> > + options = "sym-addr", "context-info"
> > + buffer_size = 1MB
> > +}
> > +
> > +ftrace.event {
> > + # Sample1: Make a histogram for initcall functions
> > + synthetic.initcall_latency {
> > + fields = "unsigned long func", "u64 lat"
> > + hist {
> > + keys = func.sym, lat
> > + vals = lat
> > + sort = lat
> > + }
>
> These event.<GROUP>.<EVENT>.hist block is an experimental syntax (plan A),
> and not implemented yet.
I'll remove this then.
>
> > + }
> > + initcall.initcall_start.hist {
> > + keys = func
> > + var.ts0 = common_timestamp.usecs
> > + }
> > + initcall.initcall_finish.hist {
> > + keys = func
> > + var.lat = common_timestamp.usecs - $ts0
> > + onmatch {
> > + event = initcall.initcall_start
> > + action = "initcall_latency(func, $lat)"
> > + }
> > + }
>
> So please drop this Sample1.
OK.
>
> > +
> > + # Sample2: kmalloc() tracing in read(2) syscall
> > + syscalls.sys_enter_read.enable_event {
> > + event = kmem.kmalloc
> > + count = 1
> > + }
> > + syscalls.sys_exit_read.disable_event {
> > + event = kmem.kmalloc
> > + }
> > +
> > + # Sample3: Stacktrace at the event
> > + kmem.kmalloc.stacktrace {
> > + count = 5
> > + filter = 'bytes_req >= 65536'
> > + }
> > +
> > + # Sample4: Take a snapshot
> > + block.block_unplug.snapshot {
> > + count = 1
> > + filter = nr_rq > 1
> > + }
> > +
> > + # Sample5: Trace-on/off
> > + block.block_plug.traceon {
> > + filter = nr_rq > 1
> > + }
> > + block.block_unplug.traceoff {
> > + filter = nr_rq > 1
> > + }
> > +
> > + # Sample6: onmax
> > + sched.sched_waking {
> > + enable
> > + hist {
> > + keys = pid
> > + ts1 = common_timestamp.usecs
> > + filter = 'comm == "cyclictest"'
> > + }
> > + }
> > + sched.sched_switch {
> > + enable
> > + hist {
> > + keys = next_pid
> > + var.wakeup_lat = common_timestamp.usecs - $ts1
> > + onmax {
> > + var = wakeup_lat
> > + action = "save(next_prio,next_comm,prev_pid,prev_prio,prev_comm)"
> > + }
> > + filter = 'next_comm == "cyclictest"'
> > + }
>
> This also an experimental syntax. Please drop Sample 6.
OK.
>
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/ktest/examples/bootconfigs/functiongraph.bconf b/tools/testing/ktest/examples/bootconfigs/functiongraph.bconf
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f9fb65caaad2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/ktest/examples/bootconfigs/functiongraph.bconf
> > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> > +ftrace {
> > + tracing_on = 0 # off by default
> > + tracer = function_graph
> > + event.kprobes {
> > + start_event {
> > + probes = "pci_proc_init"
> > + actions = "traceon"
> > + }
> > + end_event {
> > + probes = "pci_proc_init%return"
> > + actions = "traceoff"
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/ktest/examples/bootconfigs/tracing.bconf b/tools/testing/ktest/examples/bootconfigs/tracing.bconf
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..4094390ade41
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/ktest/examples/bootconfigs/tracing.bconf
> > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> > +ftrace {
> > + tracer = function;
> > + options = event-fork, sym-addr, stacktrace;
> > + buffer_size = 1M;
> > + alloc_snapshot;
> > + trace_clock = global;
> > + events = "task:task_newtask", "initcall:*";
> > + event.sched.sched_process_exec {
> > + filter = "pid < 128";
> > + }
> > + event.kprobes.myevent {
> > + probes = "vfs_read $arg1 $arg2", "vfs_write $arg1 $arg2"
> > + }
> > + event.kprobes.myevent2 {
> > + probes = "initrd_load";
> > + }
> > + event.kprobes.enable
> > + instance.bar {
> > + event.synthetic.initcall_latency {
> > + fields = "unsigned long func", "u64 lat";
> > + actions.hist {
> > + keys = func.sym, lat;
> > + vals = lat;
> > + sort = lat;
> > + }
>
> This is another experimental syntax (plan B).
> This makes histogram into actions.
I'll remove it for now.
>
> > + }
> > + event.initcall {
> > + initcall_start.actions.hist {
> > + keys = func;
> > + ts0 = "common_timestamp.usecs";
>
> But remove "var." from local variable definition.
>
> > + }
> > + initcall_finish.actions.hist {
> > + keys = "func";
> > + lat = "common_timestamp.usecs-$ts0";
> > + onmatch = "initcall.initcall_start",
> > + "initcall_latency(func,$lat)";
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Thus, please drop this "instance.bar" block.
Will do.
Thanks for the review.
-- Steve
>
> > + instance.foo {
> > + tracer = function-graph;
> > + tracing_on = false;
> > + event.workqueue.workqueue_start.actions = "tracing_on";
> > + event.workqueue.workqueue_end.actions = "tracing_off";
> > + };
> > +}
> > +kernel {
> > + tp_printk;
> > + dump_on_oops = 2
> > + traceoff_on_warning
> > +}
>
> Thank you,
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists