[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMtEkXXv1uyEI4th@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:48:17 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 22/52] x86/fpu: Rename copy_xregs_to_kernel() and
copy_kernel_to_xregs()
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 05:44:30PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The function names for xsave[s]/xrstor[s] operations are horribly named and
> a permanent source of confusion.
>
> Rename:
> copy_xregs_to_kernel() to xsave_to_kernel()
> copy_kernel_to_xregs() to xrstor_from_kernel()
Yap, better.
I wonder if simply calling them xsave() and xrstor() won't make it
even easier. The to/from kernel thing is kinda weird. If we need
to differentiate where we're saving, we can call the user variants
"to/from_user" instead, like the copy_to_/from_user things...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists