lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99e8032d-9a40-77a2-51a2-14bd8c3913cd@denx.de>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:49:53 +0200
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:     Jonathan Liu <net147@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix null pointer dereference in
 remove callback

On 6/17/21 1:19 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> If attach has not been called, unloading the driver can result in a null
> pointer dereference in mipi_dsi_detach as ctx->dsi has not been assigned
> yet.
> 
> Fixes: ceb515ba29ba6b ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@...il.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 7 +++++--
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> index 750f2172ef08..8e9f45c5c7c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> @@ -671,8 +671,11 @@ static int sn65dsi83_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>   {
>   	struct sn65dsi83 *ctx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>   
> -	mipi_dsi_detach(ctx->dsi);
> -	mipi_dsi_device_unregister(ctx->dsi);
> +	if (ctx->dsi) {
> +		mipi_dsi_detach(ctx->dsi);
> +		mipi_dsi_device_unregister(ctx->dsi);
> +	}
> +
>   	drm_bridge_remove(&ctx->bridge);
>   	of_node_put(ctx->host_node);

Looks OK to me.

Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>

Thanks !

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ