linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: lto: fix module versionings mismatch in incremental build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210617015855.6098-1-lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:58:55 +0800
From:   Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com>
To:     <keescook@...omium.org>
CC:     <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>, <lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <masahiroy@...nel.org>, <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        <nathan@...nel.org>, <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, <yj.chiang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: lto: fix module versionings mismatch in incremental build

> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 04:02:52PM +0800, Lecopzer Chen wrote:
> > Yes, We can imitate how CLANG_VERSION was implemented in Kconfig.
> > 
> > Accroding to GNU make release page[1], I've only tested for 3.81,
> > 4.2 and 4.3.
> > 4.2 was released in 2016, I think it's fine for LTO lowest version.
> 
> Okay, sounds good. Are you able to build a patch for this?
> 
> Thanks for figuring it out!
> 

Okay, I'll send a patch in a couple of weeks.

Thanks,
Lecopzer