[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMtZcVy4gvmMtYv+@alley>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:17:21 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv4 3/4] lib/test_printf.c: split write-beyond-buffer
check in two
On Tue 2021-06-15 23:49:51, Jia He wrote:
> From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
>
> Before each invocation of vsnprintf(), do_test() memsets the entire
> allocated buffer to a sentinel value. That buffer includes leading and
> trailing padding which is never included in the buffer area handed to
> vsnprintf (spaces merely for clarity):
>
> pad test_buffer pad
> **** **************** ****
>
> Then vsnprintf() is invoked with a bufsize argument <=
> BUF_SIZE. Suppose bufsize=10, then we'd have e.g.
>
> |pad | test_buffer |pad |
> **** pizza0 **** ****** ****
> A B C D E
>
> where vsnprintf() was given the area from B to D.
>
> It is obviously a bug for vsnprintf to touch anything between A and B
> or between D and E. The former is checked for as one would expect. But
> for the latter, we are actually a little stricter in that we check the
> area between C and E.
>
> Split that check in two, providing a clearer error message in case it
> was a genuine buffer overrun and not merely a write within the
> provided buffer, but after the end of the generated string.
>
> So far, no part of the vsnprintf() implementation has had any use for
> using the whole buffer as scratch space, but it's not unreasonable to
> allow that, as long as the result is properly nul-terminated and the
> return value is the right one. However, it is somewhat unusual, and
> most %<something> won't need this, so keep the [C,D] check, but make
> it easy for a later patch to make that part opt-out for certain tests.
Excellent commit message.
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> Tested-by: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists