[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc3e3595-fe10-c7ae-9560-0c7676facba2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 17:46:33 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] hwmon: (lm90) Use edge-triggered interrupt
17.06.2021 17:13, Guenter Roeck пишет:
...
>> This is a device-tree based system, in particular it's NVIDIA Tegra30
>> Nexus 7. The interrupt support was originally added to the lm90 driver
>> by Wei Ni who works at NVIDIA and did it for the Tegra boards. The Tegra
>> device-trees are specifying the trigger mask and apparently they all are
>> cargo-culted and wrong because they use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, while it
>
> Be fair, no one is perfect.
This is a very minor problem, so no wonder that nobody noticed or
bothered to fix it yet. I'm just clarifying the status here.
>> should be IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING.
>
> It should probably be both IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING and IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING,
For now I see that the rising edge isn't needed, the TEMP_ALERT goes
HIGH by itself when temperature backs to normal. But I will try to
double check.
> and the interrupt handler should call hwmon_notify_event() instead of
> clogging the kernel log, but that should be done in a separate patch.
Thank you for suggestion, I will take a look.
> Anyway, the tegra30 dts files in the upstream kernel either use
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW or no interrupts for nct1008. The Nexus 7 dts file
> in the upstream kernel has no interrupt configured (and coincidentally
> it was you who added that entry). Where do you see IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ?
I have a patch that will add the interrupt property, it's stashed
locally for the next kernel release.
IIUC, it's not only the Tegra30 dts, but all the TegraXXX boards that
use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW are in the same position.
>> The IRQF flag in devm_request_threaded_irq() overrides the trigger mask
>> specified in a device-tree. IIUC, the interrupt is used only by OF-based
>> devices, hence I think we could simply remove the IRQF flag from the
>> code and fix the device-trees. Does it sound good to you?
>
> Yes, that is a better approach.
Thank you for reviewing this patch. I'll prepare v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists