[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMtnf4lOEiF++32w@boqun-archlinux>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 23:17:19 +0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
longman@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: correct the description error for
check_redundant()
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:05:23PM +0800, Xiongwei Song wrote:
> From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
>
> If there is no matched result, check_redundant() will return BFS_RNOMATCH.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
Good catch!
Nit: you may want to capitalize the first letter after subsystem tag in
the patch title, like:
"locking/lockdep: Correct ..."
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Regards,
Boqun
> ---
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index cfe0f4374594..1f126ca7fbd7 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -2726,7 +2726,7 @@ static inline bool usage_skip(struct lock_list *entry, void *mask)
> * <target> or not. If it can, <src> -> <target> dependency is already
> * in the graph.
> *
> - * Return BFS_RMATCH if it does, or BFS_RMATCH if it does not, return BFS_E* if
> + * Return BFS_RMATCH if it does, or BFS_RNOMATCH if it does not, return BFS_E* if
> * any error appears in the bfs search.
> */
> static noinline enum bfs_result
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists