[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210618170110.3699115-3-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 01:01:08 +0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] locking/lockdep: Remove the unnecessary trace saving
In print_bad_irq_dependency(), save_trace() is called to set the ->trace
for @prev_root as the current call trace, however @prev_root corresponds
to the the held lock, which may not be acquired in current call trace,
therefore it's wrong to use save_trace() to set ->trace of @prev_root.
Moreover, with our adjustment of printing backwards dependency path, the
->trace of @prev_root is unncessary, so remove it.
Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 3b32cd9cdfd0..74d084a398be 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2550,9 +2550,6 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
pr_warn("\nthe dependencies between %s-irq-safe lock and the holding lock:\n", irqclass);
- prev_root->trace = save_trace();
- if (!prev_root->trace)
- return;
print_shortest_lock_dependencies_backwards(backwards_entry, prev_root);
pr_warn("\nthe dependencies between the lock to be acquired");
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists