[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5db7325-90ee-aee2-413f-9c21f48b50e5@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:32:21 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>, joe@...ches.com,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Use vmemdup_user()
On 18/06/21 19:04, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 18-06-21 09:53:53, Jim Mattson wrote:
>> In any case, these allocations *should* be accounted, shouldn't they?
>
> This is more of a question to maintainers. Are these objects easy to
> request by userspace without any bounds?
This particular one need not be accounted because the allocation only
lasts for the duration of the ioctl. The allocation below in
kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_cpuid
e2 = kvmalloc_array(cpuid->nent, sizeof(*e2), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
is long term and is already accounted for.
kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_cpuid2 should also use kvmalloc_array and
GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT. However, it wasn't doing so before this patch went
in, either.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists