linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix issues in check_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2760706369e7401dd794339e3f22859c243272ea.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:36:26 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix issues in check_irq_usage()

Hi Boqun,

Great, thanks! I'll ask the folks who could reproduce this issue to do
so as soon as possible.

Not sure if you saw my previous posting:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8a61ecda99843307018e3e71a5540682436443fc.camel@sipsolutions.net/T/#u

That was with patch 3 of this set already applied.

If I understand correctly, then you're basically saying that if we apply
all the 3 (or 4) patches here, it'll just change the report (that you
can see at the link above) to actually say something that I can
understand to see where the issue is?

Thanks,
johannes