linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] docs: path-lookup: Update pathlookup docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC2o3D+QjbowvyCvCsW2bFVhAhVMq4DhzLgB8X2y_p6WJsFn7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:00:24 +0800
From:   Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, vegard.nossum@...cle.com,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        grandmaster@...klimov.de, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] docs: path-lookup: Update pathlookup docs

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 6:36 AM NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 May 2021, Fox Chen wrote:
> > The Path lookup is a very complex subject in VFS. The path-lookup
> > document provides a very detailed guidance to help people understand
> > how path lookup works in the kernel. This document was originally
> > written based on three lwn articles five years ago. As times goes by,
> > some of the content is outdated. This patchset is intended to update
> > the document to make it more relevant to current codebase.
> >
>
> Thanks for persisting.  Sorry for the delay.

Thanks for the review. :D

> All:
>   Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
>
> I've noted a couple of little issues with one patch.  Hopefully Jon can
> simply fix those up rather than requiring a resubmission of the whole
> series.

if needed, I can resubmit just this single patch.

> To be honest, I haven't examined patch 4 in as much detail as I'd like,
> and it required the biggest change since last time.  But I think it is
> good enough.  It might even be excellent.
>
> NeilBrown

thanks,
fox