| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALiNf29SJ0jXirWVDhJw4BUNvkjUeGPyGNJK9m8c30OPX41=5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:25:37 +0800
From: Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, grant.likely@....com,
xypron.glpk@....de, Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
mingo@...nel.org, bauerman@...ux.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, bskeggs@...hat.com,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, airlied@...ux.ie,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@...gle.com>,
joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, matthew.auld@...el.com,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/12] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 7:30 AM Stefano Stabellini
<sstabellini@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2021, Claire Chang wrote:
> > Add a new function, swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem, for the io_tlb_mem struct
> > initialization to make the code reusable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
> > Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > index 52e2ac526757..47bb2a766798 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > @@ -168,9 +168,28 @@ void __init swiotlb_update_mem_attributes(void)
> > memset(vaddr, 0, bytes);
> > }
> >
> > -int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
> > +static void swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(struct io_tlb_mem *mem, phys_addr_t start,
> > + unsigned long nslabs, bool late_alloc)
> > {
> > + void *vaddr = phys_to_virt(start);
> > unsigned long bytes = nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT, i;
> > +
> > + mem->nslabs = nslabs;
> > + mem->start = start;
> > + mem->end = mem->start + bytes;
> > + mem->index = 0;
> > + mem->late_alloc = late_alloc;
> > + spin_lock_init(&mem->lock);
> > + for (i = 0; i < mem->nslabs; i++) {
> > + mem->slots[i].list = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - io_tlb_offset(i);
> > + mem->slots[i].orig_addr = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > + mem->slots[i].alloc_size = 0;
> > + }
> > + memset(vaddr, 0, bytes);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
> > +{
> > struct io_tlb_mem *mem;
> > size_t alloc_size;
> >
> > @@ -186,16 +205,8 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
> > if (!mem)
> > panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes align=0x%lx\n",
> > __func__, alloc_size, PAGE_SIZE);
> > - mem->nslabs = nslabs;
> > - mem->start = __pa(tlb);
> > - mem->end = mem->start + bytes;
> > - mem->index = 0;
> > - spin_lock_init(&mem->lock);
> > - for (i = 0; i < mem->nslabs; i++) {
> > - mem->slots[i].list = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - io_tlb_offset(i);
> > - mem->slots[i].orig_addr = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > - mem->slots[i].alloc_size = 0;
> > - }
> > +
> > + swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(mem, __pa(tlb), nslabs, false);
> >
> > io_tlb_default_mem = mem;
> > if (verbose)
> > @@ -282,8 +293,8 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size)
> > int
> > swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs)
> > {
> > - unsigned long bytes = nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT, i;
> > struct io_tlb_mem *mem;
> > + unsigned long bytes = nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> >
> > if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE)
> > return 0;
> > @@ -297,20 +308,9 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs)
> > if (!mem)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - mem->nslabs = nslabs;
> > - mem->start = virt_to_phys(tlb);
> > - mem->end = mem->start + bytes;
> > - mem->index = 0;
> > - mem->late_alloc = 1;
> > - spin_lock_init(&mem->lock);
> > - for (i = 0; i < mem->nslabs; i++) {
> > - mem->slots[i].list = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - io_tlb_offset(i);
> > - mem->slots[i].orig_addr = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > - mem->slots[i].alloc_size = 0;
> > - }
> > -
> > + memset(mem, 0, sizeof(*mem));
> > + swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(mem, virt_to_phys(tlb), nslabs, true);
> > set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)tlb, bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > - memset(tlb, 0, bytes);
>
> This is good for swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl. However I have just noticed
> that mem could also be allocated from swiotlb_init_with_tbl, in which
> case the zeroing is missing. I think we need another memset in
> swiotlb_init_with_tbl as well. Or maybe it could be better to have a
> single memset at the beginning of swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem instead. Up to
> you.
swiotlb_init_with_tbl uses memblock_alloc to allocate the io_tlb_mem
and memblock_alloc[1] will do memset in memblock_alloc_try_nid[2], so
swiotlb_init_with_tbl is also good.
I'm happy to add the memset in swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem if you think
it's clearer and safer.
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.13-rc6/source/include/linux/memblock.h#L407
[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.13-rc6/source/mm/memblock.c#L1555
Powered by blists - more mailing lists