[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6484679-0950-8c8e-98c5-da0e4c1d97e2@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:51:48 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, joro@...tes.org,
will@...nel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, corbet@....net
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
thunder.leizhen@...wei.com, chenxiang66@...ilicon.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 6/6] iommu: Remove mode argument from
iommu_set_dma_strict()
Hi Robin,
On 6/18/21 2:56 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>> index 60b1ec42e73b..ff221d3ddcbc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>> @@ -349,10 +349,9 @@ static int __init iommu_dma_setup(char *str)
>>> }
>>> early_param("iommu.strict", iommu_dma_setup);
>>> -void iommu_set_dma_strict(bool strict)
>>> +void iommu_set_dma_strict(void)
>>> {
>>> - if (strict || !(iommu_cmd_line & IOMMU_CMD_LINE_STRICT))
>>> - iommu_dma_strict = strict;
>>> + iommu_dma_strict = true;
>>
>> Sorry, I still can't get how iommu.strict kernel option works.
>>
>> static int __init iommu_dma_setup(char *str)
>> {
>> int ret = kstrtobool(str, &iommu_dma_strict);
>
> Note that this is the bit that does the real work - if the argument
> parses OK then iommu_dma_strict is reassigned with the appropriate
> value. The iommu_cmd_line stuff is a bit of additional bookkeeping,
> basically just so we can see whether default values have been overridden.
Ah, get it. Thanks a lot. I missed this part and naively thought it just
converts a string to integer.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists