[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d482c54-f578-5afb-9661-dbb658471b5d@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:36:08 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: axp288_fuel_gauge: remove redundant
continue statement
Hi,
On 6/18/21 11:29 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The continue statement at the end of a for-loop has no effect,
> invert the if expression and remove the continue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/axp288_fuel_gauge.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/axp288_fuel_gauge.c b/drivers/power/supply/axp288_fuel_gauge.c
> index 39e16ecb7638..20e63609ab47 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/axp288_fuel_gauge.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/axp288_fuel_gauge.c
> @@ -142,9 +142,7 @@ static int fuel_gauge_reg_readb(struct axp288_fg_info *info, int reg)
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_RETRY_CNT; i++) {
> ret = regmap_read(info->regmap, reg, &val);
> - if (ret == -EBUSY)
> - continue;
> - else
> + if (ret != -EBUSY)
> break;
> }
Thanks, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists