[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210618220136.21f32b98@xhacker>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 22:01:36 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang3@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
Cc: kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: kasan: Fix MODULES_VADDR evaluation due to local
variables' name
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
commit 2bfc6cd81bd1 ("riscv: Move kernel mapping outside of linear
mapping") makes use of MODULES_VADDR to populate kernel, BPF, modules
mapping. Currently, MODULES_VADDR is defined as below for RV64:
| #define MODULES_VADDR (PFN_ALIGN((unsigned long)&_end) - SZ_2G)
But kasan_init() has two local variables which are also named as _start,
_end, so MODULES_VADDR is evaluated with the local variable _end
rather than the global "_end" as we expected. Fix this issue by
renaming the two local variables.
Fixes: 2bfc6cd81bd1 ("riscv: Move kernel mapping outside of linear mapping")
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
---
arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
index 55c113345460..d7189c8714a9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void __init kasan_shallow_populate(void *start, void *end)
void __init kasan_init(void)
{
- phys_addr_t _start, _end;
+ phys_addr_t p_start, p_end;
u64 i;
/*
@@ -189,9 +189,9 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
(void *)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END));
/* Populate the linear mapping */
- for_each_mem_range(i, &_start, &_end) {
- void *start = (void *)__va(_start);
- void *end = (void *)__va(_end);
+ for_each_mem_range(i, &p_start, &p_end) {
+ void *start = (void *)__va(p_start);
+ void *end = (void *)__va(p_end);
if (start >= end)
break;
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists