linux-kernel - Re: remove the legacy ide driver v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57488a7b-02fa-3b3a-6719-81ab8dd64b53@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jun 2021 08:38:56 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
        Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
        Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: remove the legacy ide driver v2

On 6/16/21 8:52 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/16/21 7:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> we've been trying to get rid of the legacy ide driver for a while now,
>> and finally scheduled a removal for 2021, which is three month old now.
>>
>> In general distros and most defconfigs have switched to libata long ago,
>> but there are a few exceptions.  This series first switches over all
>> remaining defconfigs to use libata and then removes the legacy ide
>> driver.
>>
>> libata mostly covers all hardware supported by the legacy ide driver.
>> There are three mips drivers that are not supported, but the linux-mips
>> list could not identify any users of those.  There also are two m68k
>> drivers that do not have libata equivalents, which might or might not
>> have users, so we'll need some input and possibly help from the m68k
>> community here.
>>
>> This series is against Jens' for-5.14/libata branch.
> 
> Unless someone complains loudly, I plan on queueing this up end this
> week.

This has now been applied for 5.14, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe