[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210618144013.GE16116@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:40:13 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Juan Quintela <quintela@...hat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 1/7] arm64: mte: Handle race when synchronising tags
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 02:28:20PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> mte_sync_tags() used test_and_set_bit() to set the PG_mte_tagged flag
> before restoring/zeroing the MTE tags. However if another thread were to
> race and attempt to sync the tags on the same page before the first
> thread had completed restoring/zeroing then it would see the flag is
> already set and continue without waiting. This would potentially expose
> the previous contents of the tags to user space, and cause any updates
> that user space makes before the restoring/zeroing has completed to
> potentially be lost.
>
> Since this code is run from atomic contexts we can't just lock the page
> during the process. Instead implement a new (global) spinlock to protect
> the mte_sync_page_tags() function.
>
> Fixes: 34bfeea4a9e9 ("arm64: mte: Clear the tags when a page is mapped in user-space with PROT_MTE")
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Although I reviewed this patch, I think we should drop it from this
series and restart the discussion with the Chromium guys on what/if they
need PROT_MTE with MAP_SHARED. It currently breaks if you have two
PROT_MTE mappings but if they are ok with only one of the mappings being
PROT_MTE, I'm happy to just document it.
Not sure whether subsequent patches depend on it though.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists