[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210618033228.mork47zl3xydwb34@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:02:28 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] opp: remove redundant continue statement
On 17-06-21, 14:50, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The continue statement at the end of a for-loop has no effect,
> remove it.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/opp/of.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c
> index 9573facce53a..d298e38aaf7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c
> @@ -197,10 +197,8 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table,
> required_opp_tables[i] = _find_table_of_opp_np(required_np);
> of_node_put(required_np);
>
> - if (IS_ERR(required_opp_tables[i])) {
> + if (IS_ERR(required_opp_tables[i]))
> lazy = true;
> - continue;
> - }
> }
I had to merge this with:
"opp: Allow required-opps to be used for non genpd use cases"
Thanks for the report anyway :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists