[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42b3ebc2316495328e2d0061af81ef17@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 11:46:33 +0800
From: linyyuan@...eaurora.org
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb: udc: core: hide struct usb_gadget_driver to
gadget driver
On 2021-06-20 10:13, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 11:43:08PM +0800, Linyu Yuan wrote:
>> currently most gadget driver have a pointer to save
>> struct usb_gadget_driver from upper layer,
>> it allow upper layer set and unset of the pointer.
>>
>> there is race that upper layer unset the pointer first,
>> but gadget driver use the pointer later,
>> and it cause system crash due to NULL pointer access.
>
> This race has already been fixed in Greg's usb-next branch. See commit
> 7dc0c55e9f30 ("USB: UDC core: Add udc_async_callbacks gadget op") and
> following commits 04145a03db9d ("USB: UDC: Implement
> udc_async_callbacks in dummy-hcd") and b42e8090ba93 ("USB: UDC:
> Implement udc_async_callbacks in net2280").
>
thanks, this is better, lower driver only need change several places.
> You just need to write a corresponding patch implementing the
> async_callbacks op for dwc3.
yes, i will do.
>
> Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists