linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 02/33] regulator: max77620: Silence deferred probe error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YNDUhXWIgtOjf/8M@sashalap>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:03:49 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 02/33] regulator: max77620: Silence deferred
 probe error

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:40:42AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:55:59AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 04:54:36PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:47:53AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > > From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>
>> > > One of previous changes to regulator core causes PMIC regulators to
>> > > re-probe until supply regulator is registered. Silence noisy error
>> > > message about the deferred probe.
>
>> > This really doesn't look like stable material...
>
>> Not strictly, but we usually take fixes to issues that can confuse users
>> or spam logs.
>
>I really don't think this is appropriate (and don't know that it's even
>relevant without the core change mentioned in the commit log).

Oh, I misunderstood your previous mail. Now dropped, thanks!

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha