[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNEKYysw6/fUgZrL@otcwcpicx3.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 21:53:39 +0000
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 00/66] x86/fpu: Spring cleaning and PKRU sanitizing
Hi, X86 maintainers,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 04:18:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The main parts of this series are:
>
> - Yet more bug fixes
...
> and is also available via git:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git x86/fpu
...
> Changes vs. V2:
...
After reverting the disabling PASID patch, resolving one PKRU conflict, and
porting the latest internal IDXD patches to this series, I can run stress
PASID context switch tests on this series (and v2 as well). I don't see any
issue for PASID context switch.
Also thank you very much for moving the PASID feature forward.
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists