linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the xfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210622081034.472513aa@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:10:34 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc:     David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@...cle.com>,
        Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the xfs tree

Hi Darrick,

On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:51:59 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Of course, you should not really rebase a published tree at all (unless
> > vitally necessary) - see Documentation/maintainer/rebasing-and-merging.rst  
> 
> Heh.  That ship has sailed, unfortunately.  If we /really/ care about
> maintainers adding their own SoB tags to non-merge commits then I /have/
> to rebase.

We do *not* care about maintainers adding their own SOB to non-merge
commits that are in a branch that are all committed by someone else.
As you say, that is not possible without rewriting the whole branch.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped