[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsXXGcZDbbtDoXG8sQqHrAS1fs-TsRz5ndQ62sse1Av_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:26:52 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: Send FUSE_WRITE_KILL_SUIDGID for killpriv v1
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 17:19, Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> FUSE doesn't seem to be adding the FUSE_WRITE_KILL_SUIDGID flag on write
> requests for FUSE connections that support FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV but not
> FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2.
>
> However, the FUSE userspace header states:
>
> FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV: fs handles killing suid/sgid/cap on
> write/chown/trunc
> ^^^^^
>
> To improve backwards compatibility with file servers that don't support
> FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2, add the FUSE_WRITE_KILL_SUIDGID flag to write
> requests if FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV has been negotiated -OR- if the
> conditions for FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 support are met.
If server does not support FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2, then it does not
support FUSE_WRITE_KILL_SUIDGID either. The two were introduced
together and the latter is only meaningful if the
FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 feature was negotiated.
What am I missing?
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists