linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Prioritise Arm arch timer on arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d79ebd58-1c4e-834c-fc06-482f25f6f3de@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:25:47 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Prioritise Arm arch
 timer on arm64

On 17/06/2021 23:47, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:58:35AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 6/17/21 12:25 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 10/06/2021 03:03, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> On 6/9/21 12:43 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
>>>>> index fabad79baafc..804d3e01c8f4 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
>>>>> @@ -51,6 +51,15 @@
>>>>>  
>>>>>  #define TICK_BASE_CNT	1
>>>>>  
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>>>>> +/* Use values higher than ARM arch timer. See 6282edb72bed. */
>>>>> +#define MCT_CLKSOURCE_RATING		450
>>>>> +#define MCT_CLKEVENTS_RATING		500
>>>>> +#else
>>>>> +#define MCT_CLKSOURCE_RATING		350
>>>>> +#define MCT_CLKEVENTS_RATING		350
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> +
>>>>>  enum {
>>>>>  	MCT_INT_SPI,
>>>>>  	MCT_INT_PPI
>>>>> @@ -206,7 +215,7 @@ static void exynos4_frc_resume(struct clocksource *cs)
>>>>>  
>>>>>  static struct clocksource mct_frc = {
>>>>>  	.name		= "mct-frc",
>>>>> -	.rating		= 450,	/* use value higher than ARM arch timer */
>>>>> +	.rating		= MCT_CLKSOURCE_RATING,
>>>>>  	.read		= exynos4_frc_read,
>>>>>  	.mask		= CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32),
>>>>>  	.flags		= CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS,
>>>>> @@ -457,7 +466,7 @@ static int exynos4_mct_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>>>>>  	evt->set_state_oneshot_stopped = set_state_shutdown;
>>>>>  	evt->tick_resume = set_state_shutdown;
>>>>>  	evt->features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT;
>>>>> -	evt->rating = 500;	/* use value higher than ARM arch timer */
>>>>> +	evt->rating = MCT_CLKEVENTS_RATING,
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	exynos4_mct_write(TICK_BASE_CNT, mevt->base + MCT_L_TCNTB_OFFSET);
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure that exynos mct is working without problem
>>>> such as the case of 6282edb72bed.
>>>> As described on On ,6282edb72bed the arch timer on exynos SoC
>>>> depends on Exynos MCT device. the arch timer is not able to work
>>>> without Exynos MCT because of using the common module.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to change the DT to have a phandle to the exynos_mct, so
>>> it will be probed before the arch_arm_timer ?
>>
>> I think that DT changes is not proper way to keep the order between
>> exynos_mct and arch timer.
> 
> exynos4_mct_frc_start() is called unconditionally from probe via
> exynos4_clocksource_init() so as long as the mct probes first, then the
> arch timer should work, no? The rating shouldn't affect that.

How do you ensure the exynos mct is probed before the arch timer ?

The Makefile provides the right order, but the dependency is implicit.



-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog