[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210621120120.682468274@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:12:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: jpoimboe@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
joro@...tes.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
x86@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.com
Subject: [PATCH 04/18] x86: Always inline task_size_max()
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: handle_bug()+0x10: call to task_size_max() leaves .noinstr.text section
When #UD isn't a BUG, we shouldn't violate noinstr (we'll still
probably die, but that's another story).
Fixes: 025768a966a3 ("x86/cpu: Use alternative to generate the TASK_SIZE_MAX constant")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/page_64.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 9 ++++++---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64.h
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void copy_page(void *to, void *from);
*
* With page table isolation enabled, we map the LDT in ... [stay tuned]
*/
-static inline unsigned long task_size_max(void)
+static __always_inline unsigned long task_size_max(void)
{
unsigned long ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists