linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/18] objtool/x86: noinstr vs PARAVIRT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YNCRWrhMiZ7P2SRv@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:17:14 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     jpoimboe@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com, x86@...nel.org,
        mbenes@...e.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/18] objtool/x86: noinstr vs PARAVIRT


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> Per long standing request from Thomas, this here mostly sorts the whole noinstr
> validation vs PARAVIRT.
> 
> It isn't exactly pretty or robust, but it does work.
> 
> So far only tested on x86_64-defconfig+kvm_guest.config+xen.config. I did a
> quick allyesconfig build, but still saw some funnies with that, will poke at them.

Didn't see anything weird in these patches.

Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

Thanks,

	Ingo