[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210621160517.5fptdj4tkbzgqn76@gilmour>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:05:17 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: dsi: Only register our component once a DSI
device is attached
Hi Laurent,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 04:44:33AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> I'm testing this, and I'm afraid it causes an issue with all the
> I2C-controlled bridges. I'm focussing on the newly merged ti-sn65dsi83
> driver at the moment, but other are affected the same way.
>
> With this patch, the DSI component is only added when the DSI device is
> attached to the host with mipi_dsi_attach(). In the ti-sn65dsi83 driver,
> this happens in the bridge attach callback, which is called when the
> bridge is attached by a call to drm_bridge_attach() in vc4_dsi_bind().
> This creates a circular dependency, and the DRM/KMS device is never
> created.
We discussed it on IRC, but it makes more sense here.
The thing is, that patch is fixing a circular dependency we discussed
with Andrzej a year ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20200630132711.ezywhvoiuv3swo57@gilmour.lan/
It seems like we have to choose between having the panels or bridges
working :/
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists