[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNIgh8TDBZRdiqbY@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 19:40:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 60/66] x86/fpu/signal: Remove the legacy alignment
check
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 04:19:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Checking for the XSTATE buffer being 64 byte aligned and if not deciding
> just to restore the FXSR state is daft.
>
> If user space provides an unaligned math frame and has the extended state
> magic set in the FX software reserved bytes, then it really can keep the
> pieces.
>
> If the frame is unaligned and the FX software magic is not set, then
> fx_only is already set and the restore will use fxrstor.
>
> Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> @@ -306,9 +306,6 @@ static int __fpu_restore_sig(void __user
> }
> }
>
> - if ((unsigned long)buf_fx % 64)
> - fx_only = 1;
> -
> if (!ia32_fxstate) {
> /*
> * Attempt to restore the FPU registers directly from user
Nice, that was really daft.
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists