| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210622144757.055a4137@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 14:47:57 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
between commit:
2f064a59a11f ("sched: Change task_struct::state")
from the tip tree and commit:
367455053a76 ("rcu: Mark accesses in tree_stall.h")
from the rcu tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
index acb2288063b5,24065f1acb8b..000000000000
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
@@@ -460,12 -462,13 +462,13 @@@ static void rcu_check_gp_kthread_starva
if (rcu_is_gp_kthread_starving(&j)) {
cpu = gpk ? task_cpu(gpk) : -1;
- pr_err("%s kthread starved for %ld jiffies! g%ld f%#x %s(%d) ->state=%#lx ->cpu=%d\n",
+ pr_err("%s kthread starved for %ld jiffies! g%ld f%#x %s(%d) ->state=%#x ->cpu=%d\n",
rcu_state.name, j,
(long)rcu_seq_current(&rcu_state.gp_seq),
- data_race(rcu_state.gp_flags),
- gp_state_getname(rcu_state.gp_state), rcu_state.gp_state,
- gpk ? gpk->__state : ~0, cpu);
+ data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_flags)),
+ gp_state_getname(rcu_state.gp_state),
+ data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_state)),
- gpk ? data_race(READ_ONCE(gpk->state)) : ~0, cpu);
++ gpk ? data_race(READ_ONCE(gpk->__state)) : ~0, cpu);
if (gpk) {
pr_err("\tUnless %s kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior.\n", rcu_state.name);
pr_err("RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:\n");
@@@ -508,7 -511,7 +511,7 @@@ static void rcu_check_gp_kthread_expire
(long)rcu_seq_current(&rcu_state.gp_seq),
data_race(rcu_state.gp_flags),
gp_state_getname(RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS), RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS,
- gpk->__state);
- data_race(READ_ONCE(gpk->state)));
++ data_race(READ_ONCE(gpk->__state)));
pr_err("\tPossible timer handling issue on cpu=%d timer-softirq=%u\n",
cpu, kstat_softirqs_cpu(TIMER_SOFTIRQ, cpu));
}
@@@ -732,23 -816,34 +816,34 @@@ void show_rcu_gp_kthreads(void
struct task_struct *t = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_kthread);
j = jiffies;
- ja = j - data_race(rcu_state.gp_activity);
- jr = j - data_race(rcu_state.gp_req_activity);
- jw = j - data_race(rcu_state.gp_wake_time);
- pr_info("%s: wait state: %s(%d) ->state: %#x delta ->gp_activity %lu ->gp_req_activity %lu ->gp_wake_time %lu ->gp_wake_seq %ld ->gp_seq %ld ->gp_seq_needed %ld ->gp_flags %#x\n",
+ ja = j - data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_activity));
+ jr = j - data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_req_activity));
+ js = j - data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_start));
+ jw = j - data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_wake_time));
- pr_info("%s: wait state: %s(%d) ->state: %#lx ->rt_priority %u delta ->gp_start %lu ->gp_activity %lu ->gp_req_activity %lu ->gp_wake_time %lu ->gp_wake_seq %ld ->gp_seq %ld ->gp_seq_needed %ld ->gp_max %lu ->gp_flags %#x\n",
++ pr_info("%s: wait state: %s(%d) ->state: %#x ->rt_priority %u delta ->gp_start %lu ->gp_activity %lu ->gp_req_activity %lu ->gp_wake_time %lu ->gp_wake_seq %ld ->gp_seq %ld ->gp_seq_needed %ld ->gp_max %lu ->gp_flags %#x\n",
rcu_state.name, gp_state_getname(rcu_state.gp_state),
- rcu_state.gp_state, t ? t->__state : 0x1ffff,
- ja, jr, jw, (long)data_race(rcu_state.gp_wake_seq),
- (long)data_race(rcu_state.gp_seq),
- (long)data_race(rcu_get_root()->gp_seq_needed),
- data_race(rcu_state.gp_flags));
+ data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_state)),
- t ? data_race(READ_ONCE(t->state)) : 0x1ffffL, t ? t->rt_priority : 0xffU,
++ t ? data_race(READ_ONCE(t->__state)) : 0x1ffffL, t ? t->rt_priority : 0xffU,
+ js, ja, jr, jw, (long)data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_wake_seq)),
+ (long)data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_seq)),
+ (long)data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_get_root()->gp_seq_needed)),
+ data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_max)),
+ data_race(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_flags)));
rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rnp) {
- if (ULONG_CMP_GE(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_seq),
- READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq_needed)))
+ if (ULONG_CMP_GE(READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_seq), READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq_needed)) &&
+ !data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask)) && !data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->boost_tasks)) &&
+ !data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks)) && !data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks)))
continue;
- pr_info("\trcu_node %d:%d ->gp_seq %ld ->gp_seq_needed %ld\n",
- rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, (long)data_race(rnp->gp_seq),
- (long)data_race(rnp->gp_seq_needed));
+ pr_info("\trcu_node %d:%d ->gp_seq %ld ->gp_seq_needed %ld ->qsmask %#lx %c%c%c%c ->n_boosts %ld\n",
+ rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+ (long)data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq)),
+ (long)data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq_needed)),
+ data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask)),
+ ".b"[!!data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->boost_kthread_task))],
+ ".B"[!!data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->boost_tasks))],
+ ".E"[!!data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks))],
+ ".G"[!!data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks))],
+ data_race(READ_ONCE(rnp->n_boosts)));
if (!rcu_is_leaf_node(rnp))
continue;
for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists